Writing
Assignment NO.3
Frank/Rui
Wang
Gee talks
about literacy by first defining and illustrating the word ‘discourse’ by
emphasizing on 5 viewpoints about discourses that are unpopular to Americans;
then, the author focuses on the distinctions between learning and acquisition
and their relationship with literacy; moreover, the author talks about the
differences between the primary discourse and the secondary discourses; finally,
the author differentiates between the mainstream middle school students and the
non-mainstream middle school students by talking about their literacy learning
process.(P.257-263)
Initially, Gee
talks about 5 point of views which seem unpopular to Americans without talking
about literacy itself.(P.258) The first point states that discourses is
comprised of standpoints one must speak to the audiences. The second point says
that whether the discourse can be criticized depends on what the person’s standpoint
is. The third point indicates that the point of view taken by the discourse is
not only influenced by the discourses itself but also by those of its opposing
discourses. The 4th claims that a discourse can let people believe their ideas
which are totally different to those of they originally belong to. The last
point is that discourses are closely intertwined with one’s social status and
they can help people acquire some social goods where the term ‘dominant
discourses’ and ‘dominant group’ is derived.(P.258)
Then, Gee
emphasizes on the distinctions between learning and acquisition by first giving
definitions for both of them(P.259)-----Learning is a conscious knowledge
gaining process through teaching while acquisition is a subconscious process
without teaching and instead, being exposed to different situations so that
people know that they need to acquire something under such situations.(P.259)
The author also cites one of his experiences in order to illustrate that
learning and acquisition coexist but acquisition are more significant in our
daily life than learning do. (P.259)Finally, the author come to the conclusion
that learning and acquisition all have their own merits and dismerits such that
acquirers usually beat learners at performance, learners usually beat
acquirers at talking about it.(P.259)
Moreover, Gee
focuses on the differences between the primary discourses and secondary discourses.
(P.260)According to Gee, the primary discourse is an oral mode intimate people
use to communicate with each other while second discourse is the discourses
that are performed at institutions called ‘secondary institutions’ and is far
beyond than a primary discourse.(P.260-261) Then, the author comes up with a
useful definition about literacy------Literacy is control of secondary uses of
language and two applications of literacy in secondary discourse
arises----dominant literacy and powerful literacy while the latter one is used
to critique the former one. (P.259)
Finally, Gee
focuses on the differences between the literacy learning process between the
mainstream middle school students and non-mainstream middle school students.(P.261-262)
Mainstream middle school students learn their literacy through what they
experience at home or school and have many opportunities to practice what they
learn since the teachers will give them some strategies to criticize discourses
they have listened to while non-mainstream middle school students don’t have
the opportunity to listen to a dominant secondary discourse so that they can’t
practice what they have learned at school. (P261-262) Lastly, the author gives
some suggestions to future research mainly to express his idea that learning
and acquisition are both important to develop a person’s cognitive skills ;
acquisition should be advocated and it’s an efficient way to help non-mainstream middle school students
master their literacies and although non-mainstream students may have conflicts
which is opposing to their primary discourses when they master the secondary
dominant discourses, it will help them get new sorts of masteries during this
process. (P.262)
Gee, James “What is
Literacy?” Language and Linguistics in Context. Eds :
Harriet Luria, Deborah Seymour, and Trudy Smoke. London: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates 2006 P.257-264. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment