Judgment on Amanda’s case
Impacts on people’s real life
from network is not a fresh topic. The reading material illustrates a case
about a student’s honesty and people’s judgment on her react. The problem starts from
Amanda’s paper, when being checked by a system, was found
to have copied something form the other’s pieces. However, she claimed not have copied or
cheated anymore and posted this affair on the website after trying to negotiated
with her assistant and professor. But she still gained a grade F and failed to
get her degree.
It still not over.
After she posted this affair on to social networks, everyone started to blame
her and she felt disappointed and helpless. At first, she still keen on arguing
with those who abused her while after she found that didn’t mean
anything, she just kept silence.
From my view, because
I haven’t read about her work ever since, I have no right
or authority on what she have done. However, I do know something about the
mis-understanding from the social web-work. First of all, we shouldn’t put something
which produce opposite feelings of our real circumstances on the social net
because people on the net don’t know what’s happening in the real life, they just judge from
what we posted and shared on the website. Besides, there really exists some
people do like to revile the others without any reason online. Secondly,
whether or not she did treating is a private problem. That is neither
acceptable to the public nor attribute to solving the problem. In another word,
you can blame the low things of real life on the website but shouldn’t share
anything private. Besides, when she was misunderstood or judged, what I suppose
she should do is just give out the reason of the problem and keep silence. People
who arguing with you on the web could not really wanted to concern you but just
want to say something rude to release their pressure.
What she has done was
so unwise,
No comments:
Post a Comment